And why do defenders of traditional marriage, as uniting men with women to form families, resist such a change? Amazon Renewed Like-new products you can trust. Why trial could take years. Scott Dibble is one of those lawmakers. ComiXology Thousands of Digital Comics. Start reading on your Kindle in under a minute.
Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1.
Customer reviews. In this case, the student is Maggie Gallagher and the 'term paper' is her flimsy, if passionately felt, rationale for denying gay and lesbian Americans their full civil equality. A must read for everyone grappling with the policy debate currently underway, but particularly for those judges who think the policy decision is theirs alone to make.
Helping Children Survive Divorce. Back to top. Philip and Randi Reitan have been fighting for equality for their son Jake for years and have even been arrested during peaceful protests. What are the implications of same-sex marriage for children's welfare, for religious freedom, and for our understanding of marriage itself?
Why have I not seriously considered this before? John is like your favorite college professor: he offers insight so cheerfully -- and at times so humorously -- that you can almost forget that he's tearing your term paper apart. Start reading on your Kindle in under a minute.
Well done! I then realized something important--very few consequentialist arguments with solid evidence are presented by either side. Do I understand precisely where I disagree with the other side now?
I do not believe this or similar assertions, while Gallagher truly does--she ends her arguments ominously with, "We shall see. To answer my previous questions, I consider even the best consequentialist counterarguments presented extremely unlikely, so I am more solidly pro-gay marriage than ever.
It used consequentialist arguments--bad things will happen if marriage equality is realized. Although her public witness for marriage has sometimes subjected her to venomous abuse, she does not respond in kind.